Recent Entries
Movies Seen in 2011
Movie 1: The King's Speech Spoiler Policy TV Trailer: Skins Morning Coffee (1/12/11) Tonight: Lights Out Trailer: Genuine Ken Morning Coffee (1/11/11) Castle Renewed! The Cape: Don't bother. No, REALLY.
Archives
January 2011
December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004
By Subject
...and a side of existential angst.
2007 Finishes: Books 2007 Finishes: Knitting 2007 UFO Resurrection Challenge 2008 Finishes: Books 2008 Finishes: Crochet 2008 Finishes: Knitting 2009 Finishes: Books 2009 Finishes: Crochet 2009 Finishes: Knitting 2010 Fall TV Handbook 2010 Finishes: Books 2010 Finishes: Knitting 2011 Books 2011 Goals 2011 Movies 2011 Recipes 2012 NH Primary Amazing Lace 2006 Blogathon 2006 Bookish Bradley Whitford Breaking up is hard to do. Candles, candles, everywhere... CHEER Clothes Cross those stitches. Daily Reading Eating locally Endnotes Family Feminist Figure skating Food and cooking Getting to 50,000 Gift Guide Reviews God stuff Hey, look! I finished something! Holiday Music Holidays are supposed to be fun, right? How about a nice cuppa? I cannot believe this is happening. I hate moving. I love lists! I want to know! iPad Jumping on the bandwagon Kittens are cute. Knitting Life stuff Meanwhile, in the outside world... More about me than you ever wanted to know Morning Coffee Movies Music News and whatnot. No, actually, I am not okay. Of course I can knit that before Christmas. Olympic Knitting 2006 Other Crafts Piano Picoult-a-thon Politics and Policy Pop culture Pretty Pictures Product Reviews Programming Note Project Spectrum Quote of the Day Random Kat Facts Randomness Roommate stuff Sanity is overrated. Science! Search Sports Summer of Socks 2008 Summer Reading Program - My Books Summer Reading Program 2006 Tea Tech stuff Thank goodness for friends. The Best TV Show Ever The blog people The examined life The halls of academia The Shonda Rhimes empire These people are in charge? Things I'm Doing TiVo Today on the Internets TV TV and Movies TV: 18 to Life TV: Bones TV: Castle TV: Code 58 TV: Community TV: Covert Affairs TV: Glee TV: Gossip Girl TV: Haven TV: How I Met Your Mother TV: My Boys TV: Off the Map TV: Parenthood TV: Past Life TV: Persons Unknown TV: Pretty Little Liars TV: Rizzoli & Isles TV: Rookie Blue TV: Royal Pains TV: Rubicon TV: Sports Night TV: Supernatural TV: The Bridge TV: The Event TV: The Gates TV: The Good Guys TV: The Mentalist TV: The Vampire Diaries TV: Veronica Mars Warning: Liberal Weather What housework? What, me? Have an opinion? Wheeee! Winter Olympics 2010 WOMAN Challenge 2007 Work Writing Yarn Life You know you knit too much when... You spin me right round, baby.
Rings
|
March 18, 2007Review: The Cat Who Had 60 Whiskers2007 Finishes: BooksThe Cat Who Had 60 Whiskers by Lilian Jackson Braun I hate having to give any book such a low rating. I really do. But this one was... basically incomprehensible, I guess. I started reading this series when I was twelve, and even though I don't read as many cozies in general anymore, this is one series that I always read, out of loyalty, or nostalgia, or something. Some of the earlier ones really were quite good. Unfortunately, I think Mrs. Braun is overdue for retirement. Or at least needs a serious editor. Was there even a mystery in this mystery? Sort of vaguely, I guess. But there was no coherent plot, and the characters acted very out-of-character, and the writing was disjointed. It made me sad. Posted by Kat at March 18, 2007 05:46 PMComments
I was just at the library looking for a new author to read and thought about this series. Is it a series that must be read in order? I ended up with Patricia Cornwell - have you read any of her books? The Body Farm has turned out to be a very good read. Posted by: tina at March 18, 2007 07:55 PMI fell in love with the series a few years ago, but like you, I've been severely disappointed with recent volumes. I finally gave up a couple of books ago. I've never liked the idea of turning a series into a franchise by having ghost writers working under the original creator's name. But I'd rather see that happen with the Cat Who books than have them keep on the way they are. Posted by: Crafting Jen at March 18, 2007 09:44 PMThe title sounds pretty stupid. I hate books with random titles like that. I mean you should title a novel thoughtfully like "Sound and Fury" or "Of Mice and Men" You got me on soap box. Oh dear.... :( Posted by: Chris at March 19, 2007 08:50 AMYes, that's been the way of it for the last several books. I haven't read this one yet, and I will, but I stopped buying them for my collection probably 4 or 5 books ago. I do reread the earlier books on a regular basis. Posted by: Jeanne at March 20, 2007 04:13 PMI had the exact same reaction to Agatha Christie's last couple mysteries. It IS sad when an author who has given you enjoyment in the past writes beyond her lucid capacities. Where are the editors when we need them? Posted by: kmkat at March 23, 2007 12:29 AMHey there! Graduation getting close! Yay! Did you see on the KS list this morning that someone mentioned there's a movie of I Capture the Castle? I had no idea! Have you seen it? I'm almost afraid to watch it, but I added it to Netflix. Posted by: Courtney at March 23, 2007 09:07 AMI understand, Kat. I really enjoyed that series at first, but its not holding me with the plot lines any more... *sigh* Remember Flowers in the Attic? (If you're any where near my age, you will - but maybe you're not! hehe) Anyhoo, same thing. Sunk after the first coupla. Posted by: carrie at March 27, 2007 09:56 AMSomeone said they thought she has passed away (she'd be in her 90s now, I guess) and had a ghost-writer doing the work. I read such bad reviews of this book that I didn't buy it (and I have all of the books up until this one). Posted by: Amanda at March 30, 2007 02:19 AMKat, Diane Posted by: Diane at May 25, 2007 05:45 PMWHAT has happened to the CAT WHO AUTHOR??? I loved all the series & used to look forward to reading new ones, but no more. Its as if this is meant to be the last one, especially with the sad events at the end (better not say what). Put the book down feeing quite disheartened & I don't even want to read previously unread ones from earlier in the series now. This one has just spoilt it for me. Posted by: Jennet at October 24, 2007 11:16 AMAs as devoted fan, I was rather sick about the turn of events in the series. How sad it turned out, and even worse, that Polly abandoned Qwill and her cats - I don't believe it. This was a very disappointing book. It ended with saying WHAT?? I too am so upset that I cannot sleep. I have loved every book so far and have shared them with my Dad. I don't know that I will pass this one on. It is such a turn off and I have 4 cat books that I just picked up and now don't know if I want to read them or sell them on EBAY. Posted by: Teresa at November 12, 2007 01:41 AMWish I had read the reviews before reading "The Cat Who Had 60 Whiskers" because I wouldn't have read the book. Unfortunately I did read it and it pretty much spoiled the fond feelings I have for the series. How could Polly, a sensible and dependable woman flit off to Paris and abandon Qwilleran, her beloved cats, and the bookstore that was created specifically for her? Why would Qwilleran not rush over to the barn as soon as he heard about the fire? He had put too much effort into its construction and furnishing to merely shrug it off. And did he even care that Polly was staying in Paris after all their years as a devoted couple? I pondered these questions today, having read the book last night. I even found myself telling a co-worker (who has never read any of the books and doesn't like cats) about my disappointment with this installment of "The Cat Who...". The only thing that would "make things right once again" would be....in the next book it would be explained that this was all a dream and that none of the events actually occurred. That might explain some of the odd timing and the uncharacteristic behaviour of characters we have followed through 28 previous books. What a jarring experience! Posted by: Jane at November 13, 2007 07:37 PMAfter buying a 'The cat who' book at an airport to overcome the waiting time of a delayed flight, I got charmed by the little story (it was no. 5 of the series), I immediately bout all - previous and following editions - and have all 29's of the up to now released edition. Also the ...60 whiskers.. This book has to many inconsistencies. Good examples of inconsistencies are Qwill's reaction to Polly's leaving, when she had the wreck in Paris, why wasn't Qwill on the first plane? Another example is what happened to the the Absurdist play Qwil wrote, and why wasn't Arch Riker (Qwill's life long friend)not there to comfort him after Polly left and the fire???? It incorperates none of the new things that happen in The Cat Who Dropped a Bombshell. One example is that Jennifer Dimwalt was taking over The Grist Mill after Elizabeth Hart's death, where was she???? Othe examples include where are Derrick Cuttlebrink, Roger, Junior or Fran Brodie? Conversation start and stop and never pickup again and have no relevance to anything else in the book. It introduces to many new characters and really does not explain the leaving of Polly or Clarissa. Something’s do not make any sense, especially Polly moving to Paris. She would never give her cats away. This book has absolutely nothing to do with Koko’s sixty whiskers. Also, no one died after Koko’s 2nd death howl. Was it because Polly had left????? The dialogue itself seems pointless half the time, though perhaps that's due to the fact that there really isn't a plot in this book. What would normally be the main plot that actually involves a murder is often covered up by all the other events going on in Qwilleran's life. It's almost like the entire book consists of "let's see what Qwilleran and his cats are up to these days" plot threads with little coherence. Oh, they all make sense by themselves, but why they were included is the mystery. Earlier books aren't this aimless. Posted by: Patty Ficklen at December 24, 2007 04:16 PMI do not trust the Bestovers (Shirley and her son). What do we know about them. They could have done something to Polly. The sick mother that the Bestover son brought home could be a drugged Polly. To what end all this charade is going, I do not know. Hopefully in the next book Qwill will wake up, fly to Paris and look for POlly. I still think there are multiple pages missing from the end of the book! I've searched and searched and still can't get beyond the last sentence of Chapter 20 in the ones I've seen..."..."You're right!", he said, "we won't do it!" Now, is that any way to end a story? Help! Help! Can someone explain these missing (?) pages? Posted by: Joy Galloway at January 9, 2008 07:07 PMI have to agree with everything said about this last book. I have loved the entire series (up to this book) & have recommended it to anyone wanting a lite, entertaining read. I was so disappointed with the way this last book ended that I thought pages had been left out of the copy I had bought. I actually went to a bookstore to see if I maybe just had a bad copy. It would be wonderful if another book would be written that would resolve all the fragmented story lines left dangling in the "Cat Who Had 60 Whiskers". I hate to think that this "60 Whiskers" book would be the final chapter Mrs. Braun might write. She has given us so much enjoyment, I would hate to see her end her career with this book! Posted by: Roberta at January 19, 2008 03:04 PMI agree that this book was disjointed, out of character and completely odd. But I don't think we should be so quick to abandon our author. There's another book due to be released in april of this year. I, no matter how dissapointed I was by this book, am buying it. If everything is not explained in that book, then I will stop reading. This book was horrible...if she actually wrote it herself she should quit NOW...It was a complete waste of my time and money and she should be ashamed of herself for putting out such junk..and the publisher and editor...what were they thinking??? Posted by: Judi at February 10, 2008 11:11 AMI just bought "60 Whiskers" today and was able to read it in about two hours. Like everyone else, I am extremely disappointed, having read the rest of the collection at least twice. I don't believe for a second that Ms. Braun wrote this. It reads more like a collection of notes that have been poorly "embellished" by someone else who is not too familiar with the series. The sentence and paragraph structure are far too simplistic to have been written by Ms. Braun. I agree that the dialogue and events are abrupt and disjointed. The book also has exclamation points on almost every page - a favorite trick of the inexperienced and unimaginative writer. The actions of Qwill and Polly are completely out of character. I suspect that Ms. Braun is either dead or too ill to continue writing, but I am thankful for the wonderful stories she has given us. Perhaps we should all send a note to Penguin and tell them to either get a real writer who can approximate the previous work, or give it up completely, because we won't be buying any more drivel like "60 Whiskers." Posted by: Pamela at March 1, 2008 12:35 AMI agree 60 whiskers was hard to follow, and I also was wondering about Fran and Junior. But honestly, Polly was never a good fit for Mr. Q who in earlier books was always described as being attacted to, and attractive to younger women. Polly was simply boring, and I never really understood why Mr Q was with her so long anyway. Because she had a pretty voice? Because she liked books? Please. Really, it was past time for Polly to go. I was disturbed by the way she left though, although I wonder if that wasn't the entire point of the excerise. As for not having a real mystery, there was enough, or too much, going on without it. Posted by: Teri at March 2, 2008 07:34 AMI borrowed this book from the library and was also so disappointed. There is definitely something amiss here and I hope the publishers put it to right soon. I don't think this was written by a ghost writer. A ghost writer would have done a better job. Ms Braun is 95 years old and seems to be losing it. She doesn't seem to remember threads, and it appears she was tired of Polly and the barn and so just tossed them. The last few books, from Bananas on, have been real disappointments. The earlier books were great and I admired her creativity. I would like to see her turn the series over to someone else - a ghost writer if you will - who will at the least give us proper closure. Posted by: Rosalie at March 24, 2008 03:09 PMI too was really disappointed and agree with the post about all the loose ends (Patty in Dec. 2007). I'm sorry I bought it and I'm sorry I read it. Posted by: Jo T at August 24, 2008 06:45 PMI've read and owned most of these books... I'm feeling sick tonight, and finished the book while in bed... I had to re-read the last two chapters to make sure I wasn't loopy. Horrible ending, and unless this is meant to be the first part of two, I can't see how this book is even worthy of the series. Did anyone else notice that there was no chapter from the next book in the end of the paperback? I thought that was pretty much standard for the "Cat Who" books... Posted by: Ash at September 12, 2008 10:10 PM60 Whiskers was so utterly devastating to fans that I don't know what to say! No way would Polly or Quill have done or not done what they purportedly did or did not do in that story!!!!! I so looked forward to the next installment in the series, but now... I thought that The Cat Who Dropped a Bombshell, published in 2006, lacked the usual depth of vocabulary and the regular style of dialogue, so the decline may have begun then. Put and end to the ruse and don't try to fool the public any longer, please Ms. Braun!!!! Can someone solve the mystery of what has happened to the "Cat Who" mysteries? Posted by: Deb C. at January 28, 2009 12:56 PMJust was so disappointed when i finished this book that I wanted to find some where to say it. Here is a small thing about the books that caused me to immediately dislike them and think someone other than her - LJB - had been writing or a new Editor (Idiotor) had come on board. I have always read in the books that when Qwill would sit down to read a book, he would loudly declare 'Book!'. They changed it to 'Read!' Since when would such a change work? The character flow was also abrupt and without much of the depth that the characters have gained over the years. Most sad. I will hope the next book will include the word Book or I will be sorely disappointed. :-( Clifford Posted by: Clifford Phillips at February 24, 2009 10:14 PMI just finished the last book last night. It broke my heart. Everyone is right, Ms. Braun seems to have lost her style. Around the 19th book they start to fall apart. Less murder-solving and too much getting involved with everything else in town. Not enough cat antics. If she wanted to end it, the author should have ended with a flourish, not a whimper. Posted by: Rachel Mortenson at November 16, 2009 10:17 AMYes, what a disappointment. If I had to guess, I'd say LJB wrote the first half of the book, became ill or unable to finish, and someone else wrapped it up. What else could explain the easy dispatch of Qwill's girlfriend, the destruction of his adored home, and the half-hearted hint of a murderer? I guess it was some way to end a series. Post a comment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||